Eating humble pie with equals

Within modernity, humility has been relegated to those dusty back rooms where quaint religious virtues are shelved. If people think of it at all, they think of dysfunctional self-putdowns or of submission to hierarchical leadership. In Ludda, however, humility fits right in with our egalitarian ethos. On it hinges our ability to get along with each other.

Humility is at the root of two very practical behaviors: the ability to express remorse, and the inner strength to admit one’s fundamental ignorance and uncertainty. Knowing how to say “I am sorry,” “I was wrong,” and “I don’t know” is so important to us we have turned it into an ongoing reflection.

Our human limitedness leads us too often to hurt or annoy others, and to lay claim to levels of certainty which we in fact do not have access to. To counter this tendency, we seek to cultivate a humble psychological acceptance of who we actually are and a willingness to take responsibility for blunders and over-reaching. In so doing, we become truly teachable!

The opposite of humility is hubris (overweening pride). It is this hubris that goes hand in hand with the complete lack of restraint regarding novelty and technology in the world at large. Ludda’s vision illuminates another path.

pienpi

Readings:
* It’s amazingly hard to find a good succinct bit on epistemological humility, that is, the ability to live with ambiguity and human intellectual limits. Here is one attempt.
* Wes Jackson, the man who is trying to develop perennial grains, speaks well of the “ignorance-based worldview.”
* Pretending to certainty plagues science as much as other endeavors. One blogger says: ” ‘I don’t know,’ are probably the three toughest words that a scientist can ever utter.” Schools penalize students for admitting they don’t know with an F. Politicians avoid the three little words like a plague. Here is a transcript of a BBC program showcasing the fact that while everyone knows there is little certainty to be had in life, no-one wants to admit it in public. Just another one of those public secrets: the lust for certainty is a fool’s game.
* Nice ranking of apologies, from “non-apology apologies” to the real ones.
* Useful lists: how to do apologies right, and how to do them wrong.
* There is a difference between the way women and men view and handle apologies.

Back to the list of 10.

One Response to “Eating humble pie with equals”

  1. turnandwalkaway Says:

    Hey leavergirl,

    Rarely do I encounter someone who shares my feelings in such totality as I have found on this site. Unlimited kudos to you and the Ludda!

    I would like to recommend a reading to you, if I may. I found this to be a clear presentation on the inescapable problems of our understanding of anything. The cognitive biases and heuristics we employ always cloud our minds. I hope you and your readers find it similarly enlightening.

    http://singinst.org/upload/cognitive-biases.pdf

    As an aside, I find it rather ironic that the author is part of the “Singularity Institute” – an organization that appears to embrace technophilia.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s